Comparison
Middesk vs Truework
M
Middesk
Verifies the business is real before you verify the human is
VERIFIED JUN 18, 2026
T
Truework
Verifies income and employment from the source, not a screenshot
VERIFIED JUN 18, 2026
| Pricing model | usage-based | per-check |
| Starting point | No public price list | Pay-as-you-go: $54 |
| Best for | Companies onboarding 1099 contractors, vendors, or new employer entities where the risk is a fake or shell company, not a fake person. | Businesses that need to verify a new hire's or contractor's actual income and employment history without trusting uploaded documents. |
| Countries | United States | United States |
| Editorial score | 8.2/10 | 8.3/10 |
Middesk
Pros
- Pulls from actual government registries instead of scraped or third-party data, which matters when you're making a payroll decision off it
- Monitoring after onboarding catches fraud that develops later, not just at signup
- API-first design integrates cleanly into vendor and contractor onboarding flows
Cons
- US-only, so it's the wrong tool if you're paying contractors or entities outside the US
- No published pricing and no self-serve signup, expect a sales cycle
- Solves business-identity fraud, not individual employee identity, you'll still need something else for that side
Truework
Pros
- Rare in this space for actually publishing its prices
- Pulls from source systems, much harder to fake than a document upload
- Solid developer API if you want it embedded rather than used as a standalone tool
Cons
- Per-check pricing adds up fast if you're verifying at real volume without moving to enterprise
- Coverage depends on the employer/payroll provider being in Truework's network, gaps exist for smaller or unusual employers
- Built primarily around US employment, thinner outside it
United States